![]() |
![]() |
|||
Reading 4-6 Research Reviews |
||||
| About This Project Selecting Content Definitions Upcoming Additions How to Get Studies Help | ||||
Summary Tables The following links take you to summary tables for particular topics of interest. Bold topics, from Comprehension to Meta-analyses, have tables farther down this page. Comprehension has the added feature of separate subtopic pages, such as Skills Instruction. Each subtopic link (both in this list and in the 4th column) opens a separate page.
|
Comprehension (Top of page • Finding & Printing Suggestions)
Study Name |
Design Rating |
Strategy, Subjects, Effects |
Topics, Grades |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table information is abbreviated. Click "Read full review" links below for full citations of author and journal names and for details about the studies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Increasing students' awareness of sources of information for answering questions. reading_rf_1 |
5 |
Strategy: Increasing students' awareness of sources of information for answering questions (QAR) |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effect of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. reading_rf_2 |
5 |
Strategy: Graphic Organizers Subjects: 61 fifth graders from 5 intact classrooms in three homogenously grouped classes from one elementary school in a small, Midwestern city Effect sizes for:
|
Reading Topics: Grade: 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. reading_rf_3 |
5 |
Strategy: Rule-Governed Summary and GIST (Summarization Strategy) Subjects: 60 sixth graders in three classes from a suburban district in southern California Effect sizes:
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: explicit instruction, direct instruction, summarizing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension abilities. reading_rf_6 |
5 |
Strategy: Think-Aloud Strategy Subjects: 66 4th grade students from an elementary school in a rural midwestern community Results: Degrees of Reading Power - Effect Size= + .48 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. reading_4-6_4 |
5 |
Strategy: Teacher-directed strategy = directly explains information deemed necessary for comprehending the text to be read. Interactive strategy = teacher leads a discussion to help students activate their existing knowledge about the topics of upcoming texts. Subjects: 63 5th graders in Midwestern town Results: Effect size for teacher-directed strategy group +4.57 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of two instructional approaches and peer tutoring on gifted and nongifted sixth-grade students; analogy performance. reading_4-6_31 |
5 |
Strategy: Direct Instruction vs. Inquiry Approach to the teaching of analogical reasoning Subjects: 194 gifted & nongifted 6th-grade students in 2 public school systems in Central Texas Results: There were strong direct effects for training on 6th grade students' analogical reasoning. The direct instruction approach was better than inquiry at enhancing analogy performance. Gifted students consistently outperformed their non-gifted counterparts. Students' analogy performance improved from the immediate to the delayed posttest. Peer tutoring had positive effects on the receiver and those who received peer tutoring did significantly better at solving analogy problems than those who did not. Subjects who were trained by peers in two sessions performed comparably on the analogy test to those who had been trained by researchers in three sessions. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. reading_4-6_36 |
5 |
Strategy: Instruction Graphic: Frame Subjects: 164 fourth graders and 201 fifth graders from regular classrooms in ten elementary schools in a school district in a small Midwestern city. Results: Overall, students scored higher under the framing conditions than under the control conditions. |
Reading Topics: Comprehension Graphic Organizers Strategy Instruction Grades: - 4, 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. reading_4-6_40 |
5 |
Strategy: Map Construction for organizing ideas as a framework for studying. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. reading_4-6_57 |
5 |
Strategy: Reciprocal Teaching Subjects: 150 fifth and sixth graders from four classrooms in tow elementary buildings several miles apart. 8 teachers with 10 more years of experience Results: Three of four experimental groups were better at summarizing social studies materials than the control groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the ability of the students to generate questions on the social studies material. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Children’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. reading_3-5_140 |
Added 8-10-05 5 |
Strategy: 1) Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (CORI) 2) Strategy Instruction (SI) |
Reading Topics: Grades: 3-5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effectiveness of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching main idea comprehension. reading_4-6_56 |
4.5 |
Strategy: Direct Instruction paradigm for comprehending main ideas Subjects: 66 6th-grade rural Midwestern students Results: Effect Size for Explicit Paragraph Main Ideas= +2.05 Effect Size for Implicit Paragraph Main Ideas= +1.13 Effect Size for Details that Support Main Ideas= +1.36 Effect Size for Explicit Passage Main Ideas = +1.20 Effect Size for Implicit Passage Main Ideas = +1.01 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. reading_7-8_103 |
4.5 |
Strategy: SRSD- Self-Regulated Strategy Development Model
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 6-8 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. reading_4-6_5 |
4 |
Strategy: Student - centered Strategy Subjects: 67 5th & 6th graders from a year-round elementary school; in large western city; 45% minority, 67% free and reduced lunch Results: Effect Size for Delayed Testing= + .57 |
Reading Topics: Comprehension Strategy Instruction Grades: 5, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. reading_4-6_8 |
4 |
Strategy: Interest-invoking text strategies: 1) Attributes that contribute to sentence interest, 2) Insertion of information that elaborates on the central idea, 3) Resolution interest |
Reading Topics: Comprehension Strategy Instruction Grades: 4, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text reading_4-6_9 |
4 |
Strategy: Four expository text structures: Collection, Comparison/ Contrast, Causation, Problem/ Solution Subjects: 56 students in two 6th grade classes in a university lab school; wide range of abilities and backgrounds. Interview sub-sample of 30 students was randomly selected from the 56. Results: There was no significant difference between ratings for collection, comparison/contrast, and problem/solution. More subjects received "full knowledge" ratings for the comparison/contrast structure than any other structure. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Overcoming the reading comprehension barriers of expository texts. reading_4-6_20 |
4 |
Strategy: Use of comprehension strategies to aid comprehension in content area textbooks, specifically, graphic organizers and conceptual mapping, text structure instruction and summary writing. Subjects: (82) 5th and 6th graders in small rural public school Results: Instruction in metacognitive strategies does, in fact, improve comprehension. Preservice and inservice training in content area reading should be available.The training model used in this study produces favorable results in teacher effectiveness and student achievement. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading comprehension performance in poor comprehenders. reading_4-6_26 |
4 |
Strategy: Reciprocal teaching Subjects: 71 fourth and seventh graders considered to be poor comprehenders in Canada Results:
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 3-5, 6-8 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth-and fifth-grade poor readers. reading_4-6_28 |
4 |
Strategy: Mental imagery for comprehension monitoring and improvement Subjects: 124 fourth and fifth who scored 1-2 years below grade level on CAT (1978) from 5 public elementary school in Maryland Results: The use of mental imagery was positively associated with comprehension-monitoring performance. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4, 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Teaching low-performing students to apply generative & schema strategies to narrative and expository materials reading_4-6_29 |
4 |
Strategy: Schema treatment and Generative treatment Subjects: 27 fourth, fifth and sixth graders poor (2 grade levels below) comprehension and receiving special services for reading Results: No significant difference between the two interventions. Comparison on the overall effect of training was significant. Low-performing students made significant improvements in comprehension in a relatively short period of time. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4, 5, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. reading_4-6_30 |
4 |
Strategy: Paragraph Restatements Subjects: 32 elementary learning disabled students: (4) third, (12) fourth, (11) fifth and (5) sixth graders who had significant deficits in decoding and comprehension Effect size for: Test of Training on Questions = +.69 and Retell =+.61 Near Transfer Test Questions = +.80 Remote Transfer Test Questions =+.47 Retell=+.89 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 3 - 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. reading_4-6_32 |
4 |
Strategy: Generation of Questions Subjects: The grade levels of the students in these studies ranged from third grade through college. Results: Overall, teaching students to generate questions on the text they have read resulted in gains in comprehension, as measure by tests given at the end of the intervention. Effect size was +.36 when standardized tests were used, and +.86 when experimenter-developed comprehension tests were used. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 3-5, 6-8, 9-12 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. reading_4-6_34 |
4 Meta-analysis |
Strategy: Reciprocal Teaching (Cognitive Strategy Instruction) Subjects: Subjects for the collection of research varied from first grade to college level. Results: The overall results indicated that gains were made by students in the treatment groups on comprehension measures. |
Reading Topics: Grades: Diverse Learners Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. reading_4-6_38 |
4 |
Strategy: Thinking Abilities. Subjects: 168 sixth and seventh graders with average grade point of 2.36 on a 4-point scale in four large metropolitan schools in the southwest Results: Effect Size for Reading Total on ITBS= +1.11 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6, 8, 9 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: An examination of fifth- and eighth-grade children's question-answering behavior: An instructional study in metacognition. reading_4-6_47 |
4 |
Strategy: QAR - Question Answer Relationship |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5, 8 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. reading_4-6_49 |
4 |
Strategy: Instructional procedures for teaching word meaning Subjects: 60 middle-class 4th , 5th, & 6th-grade students in community of about 100,000 population. Results: Experiment 1: An integration strategy that provides for the rehearsal of vocabulary word meanings during passage reading is a more effective vocabulary training procedure than isolated vocabulary training. Experiment 2: The presences of difficult vocabulary words in a passage limits comprehension of that passage, as measured by inferential questions. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4-6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. reading_4-6_54 |
Meta-analysis 4 |
Strategy: Vocabulary Instruction Subjects: NA Results: Vocabulary instruction does appear to have a significant effect on the comprehension of passages containing taught words (effect sizes averaged +.97*) and passages not necessarily containing taught words (effect size +.30) |
Reading Topics: Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. reading_4-6_59 |
4 |
Strategy: Think aloud whiled reading and physical backtracking (re-reading) Subjects: Experiment 1: 24 fourth and sixth graders with range of reading levels Experiment 2: 24 fourth and sixth graders with range of reading levels (different student than experiment 1) Results: It was found that students rely on a variety of processing strategies; however, the processing tended to be sentence-by sentence level. The prevalent protocol was self-explanations; however, they varied in impact on recall. It was found that the relationship between processing activities and the quality of recall is quite complex and more research is needed. The Think-aloud protocol was found to be effective for the older students, but not for the younger students. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4, 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Reading growth in high poverty classrooms: The influence of reading_4-6_82 |
4 |
Strategy: Looked at overall curricular and teaching variables that account for growth in reading comprehension, fluency and writing measures over a school year in grades 1 - 5 within 9 participating school districts. Subjects: : 9 schools that were part of the CIERA School Change Project in 2000-2001 - 88 teachers (experience ranged from 0-35 years, almost all held a bachelor's degree in education or a related field, 40% had master's degrees) and 792 students (70 -95% subsidized lunch; 2%-68% non-native speakers of English; 67-91% minorities) Results: Higher level questioning was related to student literacy growth. Relatively frequent phonics instruction was negatively related to students' fluency growth in grades 2-5. Active engagement on the part of the student and the teacher had a positive impact on reading comprehension. |
Reading Topics: Grades: K-5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Process writing in the classrooms of eleven fifth-grade teachers with different orientations to teaching and learning. reading_4-6_85 |
4 |
Strategy: Process approaches to writing from 4 different orientations to teaching and learning Subjects: Eleven 5th-grade teachers selected for maximum diversity in geographic location, school size and configuration, familiarity with the state assessment program, and years of experience. Results: Two predominant philosophical stances that influenced teacher instruction in writing process emerged: curricularist and inquiry-process. The Curricularist provided instruction that was teacher-led, whole group and focused primarily on the teaching and learning of the various steps of the writing process. The Inquiry-process provided instruction in the writing process that included both teacher-led and students -centered activities. Teachers provided writing instruction on a variety of topics in mini-lessons and students were allowed choice of topics, forms, and genres. |
Reading Topics: Comprehension Strategy Instruction Misc (writing) Grades: 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Strategy instruction for elementary students searching informational test. reading_3-5_110 |
Added 8-10-05 4 |
Strategy: Strategic reading and monitoring while reading informational text
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 3-5 Keywords: self-monitoring, informational text; answering questions; locating information; factual text; 3rd, 4th, 5th graders |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effect of inference training on children's comprehension of expository text. reading_4-6_41 |
3-4 |
Strategy: Inference Training Subjects: 75 6th-grade students in intact classes at a suburban elementary school. Results: Both treatment groups scored significantly higher than the control group. The performance of below average readers did reach the performance of average readers on the posttests and delayed transfer test. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Investigating a synthesized comprehension instructional strategy: The cloze story map reading_4-6_12 |
3 |
Strategy: Cloze Story Map (CSM) Subjects: 101 Fifth graders in lower and middle class schools in Texas Results: CSM treatment significantly affected the readers' comprehension of both text types: Narrative F(1,98) - 18.24, p< .001 Expository F(1,98 = 12.29, p < .001 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5 Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. reading_4-6_13 |
3 |
Strategy: Question-generation training Subjects: 120 6th-graders; English was their native spoken language Results: Significant effects for both treatment groups, F(4, 114) = 4.58, p<.05, and question type F(1, 115) = 85.84, p<.05 |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: PQ4R as it affects comprehension of social studies reading material. reading_4-6_24 |
3 |
Strategy: Subject groups used the same text and workbook in daily 45 min. morning sessions. |
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of a mnemonic imagery strategy on good and poor readers' prose recall. reading_4-6_25 |
3 |
Strategy: Mnemonic imagery strategy Subjects: Experiment 1: 38 middle school students in a Midwestern university community with above grade level vocabulary Experiment 2: 116 seventh graders from rural Eastern community; "good" and "poor"readers Results: Effect size -
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 6-8 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: reading_4-6_27 |
3 |
Strategy: Summarization Training Subjects: 70 sixth-grade social studies students in northern central West Virginia Results:
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 6 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: A comparison of semantic-and mnemonic-based vocabulary-learning strategies. reading_4-6_44 |
3 |
Strategy: Mnemonic-based and semantic-based (contextual analysis and semantic mapping) vocabulary strategies |
Reading Topics: Grades: 4, 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. reading_4-6_53 |
3 |
Strategy: Comprehension strategy fading and progress feedback and (use of) strategy value feedback |
Reading Topics: Grades: 5 Keywords: comprehension strategies, direct instruction, explicit instruction |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Instructional strategies for studying content area texts in the middle grades. reading_4-6_55 |
3 |
Strategy: Systematic Instruction and Independent Study with Feedback Subjects: 45 fifth graders who had adequate reading (decoding) skills but demonstrated deficiencies in study skills and who were less than one year below grade level reading. Results:
|
Reading Topics: Comprehension Strategy Instruction Grades: 5 Keywords: direct instruction, systematic instruction, feedback |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: The effect of states of prior knowledge on question answering. reading_4-6_87 |
3 |
Strategy: No specific strategy/model, program, material, or intervention was used. Study looked at the effects prior knowledge of good and poor readers had on their ability to answer questions. |
Reading Topics: Comprehension Questioning Strategies Activating Background Knowledge Grades: 5 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas reading_4-6_146 |
Added 2-3-06 3 |
Strategy: Direct Instruction and Metacomprehension Training on finding main ideas
|
Reading Topics: Grades: 5-8 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement reading_4-6_156 |
3 |
Strategy: Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) |
Reading Topics: Grades: 1-6 Keywords: summarizing, PALS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Retelling and the reading comprehension of proficient and less-proficient readers. reading_4-6_160 |
3 |
Strategy: Retelling |
Reading Topics: Grade: 4 Keywords: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? reading_4-6_3 |
3 |
Strategy: Instruction on conventional expository text structure (problem/solution) and written summarization using the problem/solution text structure |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Study: Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||