
For
immediate release -- Tuesday, January 11, 2000.
Contact
Bob Brammer -- 515-281-6699
[See Update at end.] |
|
Consumer
Protection Division Sues Bettendorf
Marketers of "Breast-enlargement" Device
Company
claimed device can permanently enlarge and regrow breast tissue -- including
for women who have had a mastectomy.
Des Moines-- The Consumer Protection Division of the
Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit today alleging that a Bettendorf
company called New Womyn Inc. has no reasonable basis for claims it
makes for a medical device purportedly for breast enlargement - including
for women who have had a mastectomy.
Defendants named in the suit are New Womyn Inc. and its head, Dan Kaiser,
of 2934 Devil's Glen Road, Bettendorf. New Womyn markets from its web
site -- http://www.newwomyn.com/.
For a cost of about $2,500 to $3,000, the suit says, the defendants
sell a "Stimulations VII" device - with "biospheres" that create "negative
pressure" that facilitate "a natural growth response" in soft tissue
of the breast. The suit alleges the defendants are violating the Consumer
Fraud Act.
"Consumers are entitled to count on the fact that there is reasonable
substantiation when companies make significant health and medical claims
for products -- especially when so much money and their good health
is at stake," said Attorney General Tom Miller.
The suit contained several key elements:
- Allegations
that the defendants have no reasonable basis for various claims,
including that the device has been scientifically proven to be safe
and effective for breast enlargement, and that it would regrow breasts
that have been removed in mastectomy.
- Allegations
that the conditions of a refund guarantee "are so onerous as to
make the money-back guarantee illusory or worthless." The Attorney
General's review of the matter began with a complaint of a young
California woman who was seeking a refund of over $2,000. The suit
said the company's "18-month money-back guarantee" didn't mean a
refund was available for 18 months, but that consumers needed to
use the device for 18 months, visit a physician every month and
fulfill many other conditions before they could obtain a refund.
- A request
that the Court order New Womyn to answer a formal "Demand for Information"
served last fall by the Attorney General's office which directs
the defendants to substantiate claims for their device. Kaiser and
New Womyn asserted a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
in refusing the investigative demand.
- A request
that the Court: enjoin the defendants from marketing in or from
Iowa; prohibit the defendants from making misrepresentations; order
the defendants to answer the Attorney General's formal investigative
Demand for Information; order the defendants to reimburse all persons
who purchased Stimulations VII devices; and impose a civil penalty
up to $40,000 per violation.
The
consumer fraud lawsuit was filed Tuesday morning in Polk County District
Court in Des Moines.
-
30 -
Update:
On May 12, 2004, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the Iowa District Court's injunction and money
judgment against New Womyn, Inc., and Dan Kaiser. Defendants are therefore permanently enjoined
from making various exaggerated claims for the effectiveness of their breast enlargement device
in Iowa, and are ordered to pay the State of Iowa $398,682.52. The Iowa injunction applies only
to marketing activities occurring in Iowa or directed to Iowa residents, and Defendants are
believed to have moved their operation to Florida.
[End]
|